Monday, November 28, 2005

Oops! I forgot my week 12 picks!

Oh well. I would've picked Cleveland, SF, NE, GB, and maybe NYJ... who knows with that one. So I guess it's just as well I didn't embarrass myself again this week. Well, I am in time for the Monday night pick:

Steelers @ Colts - Gosh, I would love to pick the Steelers, but it just doesn't stack up that way. Even though Ben's QB rating is technically higher than Peyton's, and the Steelers have a chance if they can make it a running game... the difference in QB rating is largely technicality, and the Steelers won't be able to make it a running game. The Colts will get well over 300 yards passing yet again, and score about 35 points against one of the best balanced teams in football... and Big Ben will probably get injured again, further disguising the weakness of the "league's best team" - their mediocre-at-best defense. Colts win. And not because of their alleged defense.

I actually got to watch the Seahawks game this week - most of the first half and the OT actually. Who would have thought the Seahawks and Giants would be able to keep each other under 30 points for almost 70 minutes? And can someone explain to me exactly what you are allowed to move, and what will get you a false start penalty? It seemed like you're allowed to move your butt (literally) but not your shoulder or head... or at least that's how they called it. Not that I'm complaining that the team opposing my 'Hawks got hit with 5 or 6 false starts in one set of downs. I'm just curious why. Oh, and those calls all put together are less significant than that time they called it Giants ball on a fumble - even though there was no conceivable way to honestly believe that was the case. Those guys with the ugly metallic blue jerseys - they're Seahawks, pal. When one of them is on top of the ball after a fumble, that means it's Seahawks' ball. That's how the game is played. I'm no expert, but I do know that much. It doesn't seem that complicated to me, but then again, I do tend to see things in black and white. Oh, and when someone has the ball, and someone on the other team knocks him down, the play is supposed to stop. He's considered "down." That means his team gets start playing offense there, not where he's tackled a second time, four seconds and five yards later.

Sorry about the ranting and raving. Better post next time, I promise.

Backlog Bob

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Thanksgiving Day picks

Yeah, I forgot about Thanksgiving football. And I'm not doing the whole league today. Just the two games that are today. (Note: these picks were posted at 10:28 AM, EST, Nov. 24).

Atlanta @ Detroit - Atlanta by 3
Denver @ Dallas - Dallas by 4

Look for the rest of my picks on Saturday.

Backlog Bob

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Week 11 recap

Well, I got as many right as I usually do. Except there were two more games, so I had more wrong than ever before: 8-8. That's like coin-flip picking. Lest anyone say my failure is due to my fondness for underdogs, Baltimore 16, Pittsburgh 13. Baltimore over Pittsburgh! That's like San Fran over Tampa. How are we supposed to foresee this stuff? And was St. Louis an underdog? The problem is I picked the wrong underdogs, not too many.

Oh well. The Colts may lose next week. Or three weeks from now. Or whenever. There's still lots of time.

Backlog Bob

Note: By way of clarification, I'm not particularly fond of the "perfect" Dolphins of 197...2 was it? The big deal for me is that the Colts have played two good teams, one good offense, barely beat both, and they're definitely overrated. By way of contrast, the Broncos and the Seahawks are underrated, having lost only one game each in the last ten weeks, each against a well-balanced team that has stayed afloat despite a very tough schedule. The Broncos have a better chance of winning in Indy than the Colts would have in Denver, especially in winter. Dungy, Manning, etc. have to be thankful they almost certainly won't have to play football in Denver. And I don't think my Seattle fanhood is the only reason I think they would have a chance against Indy's first-stringers.

Inflammatory comment of the week: the 49ers' defense has played better in the last three weeks than the Colts' D in that same time frame.

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Week 11 picks

I must admit this is already more of a chore than I thought it would be. Now it's a matter of pride.

Cardinals @ Rams - Rams by 12.
Panthers @ Bears - Bears by 5... lesbian Panthers cheerleaders notwithstanding.
Lions @ Cowboys - Cowboys by 6.
Jaguars @ Titans - Jaguars by 13.
Dolphins @ Browns - Who knows, who cares? Oh, okay: Dolphins by 3.
Saints @ Patriots - Patriots by 6.
Raiders @ Redskins - Redskins by 7.
Eagles @ Giants - Giants by 4.
Steelers @ Ravens - Steelers by 5.
Buccaneers @ Falcons - Falcons by 2.
Seahawks @ 49ers - Seahawks by 25.
Bills @ Chargers - Chargers by14 (though I would love to believe the Bills could win this one).
Colts @ Bengals - (fanfare, trumpets) Bengals by 8.
Jets @ Broncos - Broncos by 11.
Chiefs @ Texans - Texans by 2.

Monday night:
Vikings @ Packers - Packers by 17.

Backlog Bob

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Week 10 recap

9-5. Take that, Philly fans.

Backlog Bob

Duravark

Inside that laser pointer is something fourmilier. It is an ant-eater. It shoots the laser out of its snout. Deep in the laboratorial jungles of Duravark's research facilities, scientists combine South American mammals with revolutionary energy sources to create abominations against God and nature. Duravark: leading the way in weird science.

Backlog Bob

Monday, November 14, 2005

Charged Illumination Philharmonic

Apparently some very powerful advertising executive really likes ELO. They're second probably only to the Who on television ad ubiquity.

Backlog Bob

The few, the proud...

the prognosticators who picked Green Bay to beat Atlanta. Okay, so I'm 8-5 so far this week. I have to find something to be proud of.

According to Yahoo sports, only 7% of their "Pro Pick'em" users picked GB. SO I'm smarter then 93 % of them, ain't I?

Backlog Bob

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Week 10 picks

10-4 last week: I'm sort of the man. Let's get 12 or more this week.

Chiefs @ Bills - Chiefs by 7
49ers @ Bears - Bears by 10
Cardinals @ Lions - Cards by 6
Texans @ Colts - Texans by 17... just kidding! Colts by 17 (for Curtis)
Ravens @ Jaguars - Jaguars by 13
Patriots @ Dolphins - Dolphins by 4
Vikings @ Giants - Giants by 24
Jets @ Panthers - Panthers by 11
Broncos @ Raiders - Broncos by 6
Packers @ Falcons - Packers by 4 (The Packers' margin of victory over the Saints is still wider than their total combined margin of defeat in their 7 losses.)
Rams @ Seahawks - Seahawks by 14
Redskins @ Buccaneers - Redskins by 6
Browns @ Steelers - Steelers by 15

Monday night:
Cowboys @ Eagles - Cowboys by 5

I feel good about these picks. I really think I'll get at least 12 this week.

Backlog Bob

Monday, November 07, 2005

I am not making this up (parental advisory: somewhat explicit content)

Matt Drudge makes an earnest play for most viewed website on the 'net with a fascinating story about two NFL cheerleaders having lesbian sex with each other in a bar restroom. The story says it "anger[ed] patrons waiting in line to get into the restroom." It just goes to show: what you do in the privacy of your own home is one thing, but if your perverted gay sex keeps me out of the restroom when I'm crossing my legs and hopping up and down on one foot, it becomes my business, doesn't it?

Side note: police got involved when one of the cheerleaders allegedly struck someone on her way out of the restroom.

Backlog Bob

P.S. I might get more hits now that I've used the words "cheerleader lesbian sex," but I'm going to have to monitor my a-d-v-e-r-t's really closely now.

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Week 9 picks

Oh no! Not again!


Bengals @ Ravens - Bengals by 13
Titans @ Browns - Titans by 6
Texans @ Jaguars - Jaguars by 14
Raiders @ Chiefs - Chiefs by 10
Falcons @ Dolphins - Falcons by 8
Lions at Vikings - Lions by 17
Chargers @ Jets - Chargers by 15
Panthers @ Buccaneers - Bucs by 6
Seahawks @ Cardinals - 'Hawks by 13
Bears @ Saints - Bears by 6
Giants @ 49ers - Giants by 27
Steelers @ Packers - Steelers by 10 (GB 1-6, still outscoring opponents 158-139)
Eagles @ Redskins - 'Skins by 3

Monday night:
Colts @ Patriots - Pats by 6

Backlog Bob

Friday, November 04, 2005

A song for Lunesta®©™

You know how TV ads appropriate popular songs for use in hawking their respective products? Well I think that those 1AM Lunesta©™® ads should capitalize on that shiny butterfly they have, and use Crazy Town's "Butterfly" on their ads - and kind of like the anti-depressant ads that play hellishly depressing music, a sleep aid ad that at 1AM plays songs by bands that perform at Ozzfest would generate its own demand. Say, isn't that, like, an economic law or something?

Backlog Bob

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

I know, I know...

8-6 again. And if you don't count the two obvious ones, it's actually 7-5. You can't see me, but I'm smirking and raising one eyebrow.

Backlog Bob